ineffit: (castiel)

So you don't need to know it and I don't need to say it, but it's important to address the fact that I HATE voting with a burning passion. From my perspective, it's always "so I vote for the corrupt guy, or for the slightly less corrupt guy?" and "will the less corrupt guy become as corrupt as the corrupt guy once he's in office??" I voted in Mexico when I was eighteen, and then I came here at twenty, and I hadn't voted for about five or six years, and then one or two years ago I became a citizen. I am not a patriot in any way for any country, tbh. I became a citizen because this is where I live now and I deserve the safety of knowing nobody's going to try to deport me and if someone tries to tell me I'm not welcome here I can spit on their faces (not really, I wouldn't do that...).

 

Becoming a citizen is actually a million times easier than applying to become a resident (and much, much cheaper too). True, you have to apply and pay $700 for the application, and get a lawyer of course because it's safer, and then wait months and months for them to contact you to tell you whether they will allow you to take the test. Then you have to study 100 (a hundred) questions because, even though they will only ask you 10 (ten) and you only have to answer 6 (six) of them correctly to pass, you don't know what they're going to ask you, so you have to memorize all of them (or as many as you can). The worst part is the nerves; once you're done with it and you passed, you're like, holy shit that was surprisingly easy. Of course it helps if you already speak English (which you have to or they may not even consider you). Then you have to go to the ceremony where they make you make a bunch of promises to the country (even though nobody will stop looking at you like you're an immigrant). And then, once you get your papers and stuff and the tiny U.S. flag that they give you, you can go out and eat pancakes or something.

 

This is the part where I tell you why voting sucks extra as an immigrant:

What the fuck is up with the type of language they use in the ballot?? Where the hell do I research all of these people trying to get in the government?? ballotpedia didn't give me any useful information, I tried, I swear. Why are people not more open when talking about candidates??? No, I'm not watching the news because I don't understand your political system anyway; they don't talk about the "lesser" people anyway and I already know the current president sucks. How do you expect me to know what the university and college candidates are for and what's their plan of action???

Be honest with me, if none of you know these things and you've been living here for forever, why hasn't anybody changed this.

Did you know that a lot of people voted against removing the slavery thing from the constitution because they didn't understand what it said?

 

I think I did pretty decently for my second first time. It did take me like two weeks, not going to lie. I'm glad he's fired now. I am beyond PISSED nobody has addressed anything to do with migration yet.

Are we going up on the number of refugees welcomed again?

Are we getting rid of ICE finally?

Are we closing the fucking camps already?

Are we acknowledging people coming in from Latin America as refugees when necessary or will we continue to ignore the necessity for this just due to our stereotypes and prejudices against Latinx people?

What are we going to do about the children?

What's the legal plan of action in the case of all the women (and children) who were raped and molested and lost and who had forcefully removed their uterus?

What's going to happen with DACA?

 

I demand to see someone be punished for that. I demand compensation for these people.

Why have neither of the winners addressed any of this?

 

I know what your country made me promise when I became a citizen. I also know they haven't done their part on all the things they promised me, so why should I?

ineffit: (loki)
I thought about this question for a while. Before migration, the common assumption is that one will die wherever one was born. There is no reason to question where do I want to die if the connection to a single place is so strong that it doesn't make you question exactly who you are, where you are from, why are you there, and whether you want to remain there or not.

I was thinking about the people who died trying to cross the Mediterranean Sea and how they will never get to decide where to die. Most people don't, I guess. But there is something sad about dying away from home when you wish so badly to stay there.

This is a question that comes to mind when you have left the place you used to call home and you haven't grown roots in the place you've arrived to.

Once you spend enough time in a place that the place where you used to live stops being the only one with a home for you, you start asking this question to yourself. What is the last thing I want to see before I die. Will I be able to see that which I left behind before I die, will I be happy to see this new thing by then. Which soil do I want to root in. In my family, we'll be cremated and thrown at the sea like my grandma.

There is a popular song in Mexico that says something along the lines of "my beautiful, beloved Mexico, if I die far away from you, tell them to say I'm sleeping, and have them bring me back to you." And now that I'm away I've been thinking about it.

I have lost my sense of permanence. Sense of place, I think you'd call it in English. I don't know where I want to die, it's what I mean. I can't decide. The place I left behind doesn't exist anymore, and the place where I'm at right now is not the place that feels like home in my heart.

Time takes away the things you left behind. Whatever my country was when I left is no longer, and so whatever I remember, it doesn't exist anymore. It will never exist again.

We are privileged though. The people who died in the Mediterranean Sea didn't even get the chance to wonder if they would be sad to not be able to die where they were born. Is it unhealthy to have such an attachment to a place when so many of us are migrating?

I get to ask these questions because I have the privilege of having made it. And I think about that a lot sometimes. My experience as a migrant was a horrible one that I do not wish on anyone at all, and yet I was lucky enough to cross the border with papers. If my experience as a documented person was horrible enough to leave a lasting trauma and scars that are unlikely to heal, what was my grandma's cousin's experience like, when she had to cross the river with five small children and without knowing how to swim. The difference is that I have the privilege of wondering about it and she has shut it down enough that maybe by now it feels like a dream. Migrants don't talk about their experiences, and I wonder why, and I wonder if it is because talking about them makes them so much worse, or if it is because there are really no correct words to describe any of it.

Sometimes we're left to wonder at our own selfish wishes. What right do I have to do what I like doing when so many people couldn't make it. Or do I live this life for them.

One of the African migrants who made it into a refugee camp in France talked about the promises of The North. Europe promised them democracy and freedom and a better life. Nobody told them that The North always promises so many things but they are always lying. There is none of that in The North. It doesn't exist for their own people and it doesn't exist for those who dream about it under war skies and famine. We need to stop preaching the migrant fairy tale of a perfect country waiting for us.

It makes me angry every time I see a post on social media about a rich, European country looking for people to come live to their countryside because their population is declining because they don't need to invite strangers, they need to make themselves responsible for the atrocities they have helped commit that have caused so many refugees. Stop asking for people when you could just let refugees in.

Those posts may be fake, but my desire to slap someone whenever I see them is pretty real.

Everyone along the path refugees walk through thinks they're doing their best job. Refugee camps in Germany think refugees are having a great time there. But why. Why is it so difficult to treat them like people. Why is it so easy to yell at them to tell them to move from one place to another, why is it so difficult to give them information, why is it so difficult to provide them with proper transportation instead of moving them about in the back of trucks, "like pigs," my grandma would say. Why is it easier to send the police to arrest them instead of providing them help. Why is it easier to build walls.

How dare we talk about how horrible WWII was when we are still building concentration camps and treating people worse than we treat objects.

"Nobody said no to helping the tiger."

How is it so difficult for powerful countries who claim to have everything figured out to answer these questions. Maybe I'm just bitter.

If you could pick a place to die, would it be home? Do you have a place you call home? If you could pick a place to die, where would it be? I'm asking for myself.
ineffit: (derek)
I was officially diagnosed with depression about five years ago or so even though I've had it pretty much most of my twenty-six years of life. There is no point to this text actually; most of the time, when people talk about their depression is to let people know that it's going to be okay and it doesn't last forever, and there's always ways to overcome it, and please don't kill yourself.
I have nothing against positive messages, they are extremely necessary, but if you have depression for as long as I've had it, you know it doesn't get better. Depression doesn't just go away, and that's something I wish sometimes people would talk about more. There are a lot of neat messages from when your depression is not so bad, for when you feel like fighting it, but not really much for when you're deep in the hole and are getting ready to be comfy there for a while. "How to get out of a hole you want to be in?" There should be a book with that name (is there? Someone send it my way).
The thing with depression is that you don't always want to feel better. Sometimes you are so deep in your own head that you don't see the point on wanting to feel better (or on feeling better). This doesn't always mean you want to die, and there is a fundamental difference between wanting to die and wanting to not exist that is not addressed when we talk about suicidal behaviors. Wanting to kill yourself is an active thought, from my experience. I haven't wanted (or tried) to kill myself in many years. I have, however, wished I didn't exist quite often. Wishing to vanish from existence is rather a passive thought. You sit there, you look around, you feel miserable all the way down to your bones, and then you decide you don't want to be. You want yourself to stop existing, which mustn't be confused with wanting to die. Wanting to die implies to have had existed, implies doing something to stop being. Wanting to vanish is the illogical and not-very-realistic idea of suddenly disappearing from existence. When I wish to disappear I'm not wishing to die, I'm not trying to kill myself or plotting my own dismissal, I'm just sitting there hoping I can stop being part of everything at least for a while.
They are both miserable thoughts, but one is listened to, and the other one is so ridiculous nobody who hasn't felt it understands what you're talking about unless you explain it with great detail--and more often than not they still think you want to kill yourself.
I can't use the phrase "not to be a downer" because I probably am trying to be a downer right this second and I can't bring myself to feel bad about it either. If you have the type of depression I have, the one that comes and doesn't go, it's just softer sometimes and then worst other times, you know there's no helping it, you have to engage in sadness from time to time because it is all you can feel.
The problem is that people will try to tell us how to fix the problem and we know it cannot be fixed. I'm not trying to kill myself and I'm a positive person most of the time, but I do have depression and there is no cure for that. Some days I remember I have to live with that for the rest of my life, and then the days when I'm feeling the worst become longer and heavier and more unbearable, because they aren't alone; this is not a single day that I'm feeling bad, it's just one of many more I've had and many more I will have. And therapists tell you to live for the good days, not for the bad ones, but the bad days are still there. I cannot just ignore the bad days. They will keep coming, and more often than you'd like you cannot be prepared for them; there is no getting ready for a bad day, it hits you on the face like a ton of bricks and it comes out of nowhere. You are fine one second and the next you don't understand the meaning and purpose of your own existence and everything you've done with your life is meaningless. 
It would have been nice if someone had told me that at some point. "Just so you know, you're going to be miserable some days no matter what you do" "Heads up, there will be mood swings and you will forget sentences from five seconds ago like they were told to you when you were two years old" "Sometimes, you will be hyper-aware of how meaningless life and everything you do actually is."
Life is not meaningless, of course. We don't know the meaning of it, but that doesn't mean it's meaningless. There are all sorts of things to do and all sorts of things you can enjoy. But here is the thing: when you have depression, the things you enjoy become a chore.
I've been in therapy for a while, and one of the first things that you have to try to get better is do things you love. Do things that make you feel good. I think there's a lot of "distracting yourself from the pain of life" in therapy.
I tried everything. It sounds like an exaggeration because obviously you never want to think you've tried everything you could possibly do to get better, but there things that must be taken into consideration: First, "everything" is a giant grey area. Second, depression makes you too damn tired, and "trying everything" is something that takes up a lot of energy, so my "everything" and your "everything" may not look anything alike.
Third. Today I feel like talking about all the things I've tried and how I'm still feeling miserable. Not only how I'm still feeling miserable but how I may have lost all love I had for doing anything. In this, it's important to consider that when we say "I can't" we actually mean we literally cannot. There is a physical force that pushes us back, and no matter how much you try, when you're deep in the hole, there is just no doing of any kind. We need to talk about this moments as much as we talk about the moment we got better, because we forget to tell ourselves that we are not always better, and we won't always be fine, and then when we are not fine we think we have failed at everything.
I do not have a recovery story. I have gotten better, in a sense; I don't spend days in bed, not showering and crying, for one thing. I call that getting better, but it's hardly becoming a functional human being. I have had accomplishments that should probably make me proud and that other people have congratulated me for, but they hardly seem like anything important to me; they look like things I was supposed to do, somehow. No matter how big the thing is, it looks like something silly that anyone else (literally anyone else) could have done with way less effort and better results. I try to look at them like they are something important, and to remember that I, me, I put a lot of effort and work in them, that I did something. That I am doing things. It doesn't work most of the time; more often than not I think I could have done something better, or that I'm not cut for the job. 
Example: I got an internship in one of the oldest literary magazines in the country. It sounds fancy, even though we all know internships seldom are as fancy as they sound (it was us sitting on our butts for nine hours a week, reading submissions). The thing is, not everyone gets these things, and I did, and I should feel accomplished, I should feel entitled to feeling accomplished, but I do not. I've gotten many things in school, for which I work hard, and still I hardly feel excited about most of them.
I was given an award for creative non-fiction piece I wrote.
I was invited to read to two formal events.
I was published in a silly magazine because apparently my poetry is decent.
I got a few monetary prizes.
All these things sound big when I write them down, and yet they feel like out-of-body experiences. Like it wasn't me the one who did the thing.
Now, when I say I've tried everything, I mean everything I could think of.
I still lost the love I had for doing things. Doing things and not having them make you feel better is nowhere near as painful as doing things you use to love and discover now you're too tired and done with life to appreciate them. So consider: if you loved something, you tried it to maybe feel better, and then you don't feel better no matter how much you do it, you try, or you love it, you end up not really loving it anymore. It's like your love for the thing is broken and there's no way to fix it. Like it failed you, or rather like you failed it by not enjoying it as much.
Then you just stop doing the thing. Because the joy of doing it is not there anymore no matter how much you try.
I used to enjoy listening to the radio, and now I don't, not really.
I used to read book after book. It was the only thing I wanted to do, it was a refuge, a place I could be. I don't think most people can understand how painful it is to pick up a book and discover you're incapable of enjoying it anymore. You're incapable of losing yourself in the pages, of paying attention, of not getting distracted. You're not capable of reading the thing, get to the fifth chapter, and still remember the chapters before that. You forget what just happened. And then you don't have the energy to read it again. You want to keep reading, but everything feels so heavy you know you won't like it if you keep reading. Reading is all I wanted to do with my life.
I tried painting and gardening, like they tell you in therapy. I tried coloring books and journals. I tried going out by myself and I tried socializing. I tried cooking (which I'm quite good at). I tried working and then not working. I tried exercising, bought a bike, went to the playgrounds. I drink water everyday and I eat fruits and veggies, and I tried taking baths and using oils. I tried meditation, which you can't really do when you're brain won't shut up. I tried yoga, and then didn't feel like doing it anymore because all the damn people who do yoga always feel like being too damn positive, when most of them are just stealing from sacred millenary practices that have deep spiritual meanings they don't really understand. I tried going to the movies. And I try writing. 
There is not a single solution and there is nothing that will work forever, and more often than not I find myself unable to do anything I like doing. And I guess because I'm feeling down I would like people to talk less about how you get over depression and how it will get better, and more about the times we will fail at getting over it. The times we will willingly go back to it and embrace it because we can't do better those days. The times we fall in the hole no matter how much better we thought we were doing. I want people to talk about how there's no cure for this, and how even if you take medications and you try your best, sometimes you don't feel any better. I want people to acknowledge that more often, so we can get used to that feeling. The us, being miserable because that's how depression works. Us, hating ourselves maybe, because we don't know how to love the things we used to love anymore. Us, crying because we don't know what to do.
I want us to think about the bad days prepare ourselves in the hope that, when they come, we may be a bit more ready.


ineffit: (karkat)

El año pasado, si no me equivoco, empezó un argumento sobre la necesidad del lenguaje inclusivo en el español. Se cuestiona el uso del masculino como género neutro y el sistema de habla binario. De acuerdo con el argumento a favor del llamado "lenguaje inclusivo", nuestro actual sistema no toma en consideración a las personas que se identifican con un género no binario (ni masculino ni femenino; podría ser género fluido, género neutral, género tercero, transgénero cualquier otra de las configuraciones fuera del "hombre" o "mujer"), y el uso del masculino para los plurales y generalizaciones es una representación de un sistema machista que no toma en consideración a las mujeres y ayuda a minimizar al género femenino en un contexto más amplio. En resumen, no es preciso ni correcto y fundamenta una institución que discrimina a las mujeres. Por el lenguaje se empieza.

Existen varios argumentos contra el uso del masculino como neutro, pero uno de los más mencionados es que, así como se usa el masculino también se podría usar el femenino, y si las razones no son sexistas entonces no debería haber ninguna gran diferencia entre uno y el otro. Nuestro sistema presente y nuestra inhabilidad de cambiarlo, el rehusarnos tan fuertemente a considerar el femenino como un reemplazo digno y eficiente nos demuestra que aún vemos a los hombres como un género superior; que se considera más importante respetar a los hombres que a las mujeres, y que las mujeres no merecen un espacio más amplio y un lugar más público.

Es evidente que un cambio es necesario, sin embargo, usar el femenino como neutral no soluciona el problema. Sí, desafiaría el sexismo del lenguaje, pero continúa siendo un sistema binario y por lo tanto un sistema excluyente. Una generalización que está hecha con género específico no es una generalización apropiada, y en tal caso, un género neutral que no se relacione ni con el masculino ni con el femenino es necesario.

No obstante, cuando se considera esta adición al lenguaje, no es acertado llamar a un lenguaje sin género un lenguaje "inclusivo".

El uso de la letra "e" en lugar de la "o" o la "a" para generalizar es la forma sugerida recientemente para crear un lenguaje que incluya y represente no sólo a los hombres y mujeres sino también a aquellos que se identifican con ambos a la vez o con ninguno (que podemos denominar como "trans" por su referencia al inglés en términos de "transgressing gender") es lo que se ha llamado "lenguaje inclusivo" y que ha creado tanta controversia. Para la mayoría de aquellos que no están de acuerdo, el cambio representa una aberración del lenguaje. Es un cambio "innecesario". Pero decir que es un cambio innecesario no es acertado porque debemos considerar que si los hablantes, no importa cuántos de ellos, si un grupo de hablantes ha sugerido dicho cambio, eso significa que hay una necesidad que cubrir. El cambio no es innecesario si hablantes lo han demandado. No se puede usar como excusa que es sólo una pequeña porción la que considera el cambio como necesario porque se está hablando de un grupo minoritario; por supuesto que son una pequeña porción, pero considerar que sólo porque son pocos sus necesidades no deben ser consideradas necesarias porque no parecen beneficiar al resto de la población es discriminatorio. Las necesidades de las minorías deben ser consideradas, y si la minoría LGBTQA+ piensa que el lenguaje debe ser modificado después de siglos de no considerar a dicho grupo entre sus prioridades, es fundamental que aquellos 'a cargo' del lenguaje escuchen.

Como los lingüistas saben, las personas moldean el lenguaje. Las necesidades de los hablantes son más importantes que mantener un lenguaje en un estado inamovible. Las únicas lenguas que no cambian son las lenguas muertas porque nadie las está usando, si una lengua es utilizada, es inevitable que dicha lengua va a ser sometida a cambios por los hablantes. No se puede detener y no debe intentar detenerse, es el curso natural de una lengua. Lo que hablamos hoy día es producto de siglos de cambios, adiciones y modificaciones, que fueron hechos mayormente por aquellos que no se encontraban en el poder; son cambios que pasan con el contacto para acomodar las necesidades de los hablantes. Hoy día, los hablantes requieren una lengua que no sea limitada por el género, por lo menos en cuanto respecta a individuos (cambiar el género de los objectos no es un asunto urgente).

Dicho eso, como mencionado anteriormente, sólo porque un lenguaje sea neutral en género no significa que sea inclusivo. Cuando se habla de inclusividad hay muchas otras cosas que deben ser tomadas en consideración. El argumento en realidad es breve y se enfoca en el uso de la palabra "inclusivo" para denominar a un lenguaje neutral. Idealmente, un lenguaje inclusivo sería aquel que es accesible y entendible para todos sin importar clase social. Crear un sistema que incluya un pronombre neutral se vuelve más complicado cuando consideramos a aquellos que no tienen el mismo acceso a educación que aquellos que sugirieron y participaron en la creación de dicho lenguaje. Cuando un cambio se hace en un entorno académico, que se desarrolla en un entorno con acceso a ciertos privilegios, las clases sociales que no cuentan con estos privilegios están siendo dejadas de lado. Sería virtualmente imposible para una persona mayor de bajos recursos entender un lenguaje al que nunca se ha visto expuesta porque su posición social y de clase no se lo permite. Un cambio que se hace en un entorno como el mencionado no es inclusivo de todos y por lo tanto sería más apropiado llamarle un lenguaje "neutro".

Aun cuando podemos afirmar que dicho cambio es un cambio necesario, es importante que no olvidemos que hay otras situaciones que también deben ser consideradas. El feminismo, después de todo, será interseccional o no merece ser llamado feminismo.

ineffit: (abel)
 I think of the rain sometimes.
The difference between Fahrenheit and Celsius is greater when you understand the distance. If you have only experienced one of the two then there is no point of reference and it's hard to understand that forty degrees can mean a hundred and four. It is a bit like that with the rain, but it is also more difficult to explain.
When I think of the rain it seems to me like the rain lasted forever. There was rain every month, the was random rain sometimes, when it wasn't supposed to rain and no one was expecting it. There was rain when nobody knew there was going to be rain because nobody bothered to look at the weather report; if rain came then rain came and there was not much to do about it. Rain was fine, nobody worried about rain unless it wasn't coming.
I walked about twenty block under the rain one time because I didn't want to wait for the bus anymore. I ended up so wet that my teeth started shivering and my skin turned purple. If I could spend all the days of my life deciding if I want to take the bus or get wet, I would pick either because both would mean there would be rain to see. But it is different here and now.
There is no rain. The winters are cold and unforgiving and it only rains at night. Now I don't get to decide between taking the bus or getting wet because there is no rain when the sun is out. There is no soaking of the streets, there is no smell of wet dirt.
I finished writing my first long story on a rainy afternoon. The drought makes me feel like there aren't enough words out there for me to express what I want to say, and I think about the rain when I'm desperate and lonely. I think about the sound of water hitting the streets made of stones rather than concrete, and the trees dancing with the wind, and the grey skies that open up to let the heavens cry. And I often wonder, what's the point of having grey skies if we don't get any water down? 
I think of the rain when I sit on the edge of my bed and there is only silence. The clock ticks and tocks and there are no raindrops. The bookshelves crack and shake and there is no thunder. Here, there is thunder without water, and it feels like screaming with no sound, it feels like heartbreak.
It is easy to think about the ocean when it rains, like waves of happiness, a memory of the water that keeps coming around. It is easy to think, "ah, that's the same water," and smile. And when it rains I feel a little bit less lonely. And when it rains, I feel a little bit more at home.
But when the winter hits, I look out the window and wait for the spring. And when spring doesn't rain, I wait for the summer. Then I wait for the fall. Then I wait again. I have forgotten when it's the time for rain, but in my mind it is always raining.
ineffit: (Default)
 the year is almost over again, and i figured it was a good time to write something. i haven't written something in a long time, and i mean something that is not for any of my classes, because if you count that then i've been writing kinda too much but i didn't necessarily enjoy it all. 
when one writes, sometimes is hard to come up with something to write about. there is nothing really i want to say. or maybe there is too much and that is why it's so hard to write about it. too many thought always lead to not being able to pick one to focus on and then i lose my train of thought and end up not writing anything. i have done that too many times. the thing is, that the more i spend without writing something just for the hell of it, the more i forget how to do it, and if there is something in life that i will never forgive myself if i forget how to do it, that would be writing. 
i am not, by any means, a fabulous writer. sometimes i don't even think i'm good enough to read, but i like writing, if not for others (considering nobody reads this blog) for myself. i write for myself. for the longest time i just wrote and wrote, filled notebooks, and papers, and cards, and napkins. i wrote on the public restrooms walls, afraid someone would know it was me because you're not supposed to write on them. i wrote on doors, and walls in my house and got yelled at but kept on doing it because the police couldn't catch me on that. so i write. it doesn't have to make sense but i like the sound of words in any form; when writing, when talking, when reading, when singing. i love words in a level that not even i understand, because i don't love them like anything else i've loved before. when i like something very very much, i get overly excited and emotional over it, but words? words i love with a peace that i never thought i'd have over something. i love words truly from the bottom of my heart. someone said one time, that love wasn't about intense emotions but balance. words make me happy. words so important and people don't take them into consideration as much as they take other things. words go beyond what we see as words, and transcend to communication, and communication can take so many forms. some people don't know how to write, so they paint; some others do math. as i see it, it all comes down to the way we transmit something to someone else, and that is what words mean to me. beyond just the things we put down. 
words come better when you're writing, i have to remind myself: if you don't try to write something, if you don't show up and do your part, if you don't put your hands to use and try, at least, the bare minimum, and write something, nothing is going to happen. write. show up to work and write. whether you write something worth can be determined later. can be determined by someone else. but if you don't write anything, there will be nothing to determine. there will be nothing. 
so here i am, writing before the year is over. writing about something i wasn't even thinking about. avoiding the things that are socially important to talk about something that is important to me. here i am writing. talking about myself, something that i try to avoid at all cost but always end up doing. if the year ended and i didn't write anything i would have failed myself. goals are a strange thing, but here is mine: write. at all times. if you see the opportunity, take it, run away with it, write at any free moment. when you think whatever you wrote is absolutely no good, remember that you did your part of the job, you showed up and wrote. remember how bad you used to be, and remember how much better you are now, even if you think is not worth reading. keep on writing.  
when the year is over and the next one comes around, things out there in the world will probably not be as good as they could be, and maybe you can't do anything to help, and maybe you want to change the world, and maybe you want world peace, but you don't know what will be of any of that, and maybe the world will be better, maybe we'll catch a break god bless please lord. whatever it is, you have this. whatever it is, write. just write. 
ineffit: (derek)
 Dear Mr. Shaun David Hutchinson, 

A little bit over a year ago I read your book "We Are The Ants" and I decided it was the best thing I had read in a long time. It speaks to me in so many levels, I had to go back, read it again, highlight all the things that made me cry, and separate all the end-of-the-world chapters. It is not often that, as a reader, we come to find books that make us feel this way, and I cannot thank you enough for that. I don't think I liked YA before this, so I'm going to blame you on that. 

I'm trying to say something specific here, I swear, I just need to put my brain together. You see, I've had depression since I was very young. I thought about killing myself a few times before I was even twelve; I want to believe you will understand why it is important to me to say this. Sometimes, when we are depressed, we think nobody understands. We think, "so what's the point?" And it takes someone telling you that they don't see the point either to make peace with yourself. To understand that, no matter how many bad days there are, there are always good days too. It's hard. But you know that already. 

I'm not a teenager anymore, and I've come a long way, and had a few traumas myself, to tell you that your book was not just a book to me, and no matter how much other people didn't like it, how much it didn't matter to other people, it mattered to me. 

After I read "We Are The Ants" I decided I wanted to read everything else you'd written, and I came across "The Five Stages Of Andrew Brawley."
This is what I was trying to get at. Here's the thing: my favorite part of We Are The Ants is that it doesn't focus on the fact that the characters are queer; it's just something that is, and it's okay. The thing about Andrew, it's that somehow it ends up focusing in this fact. 

When I was around the age of ten, someone in my family told me this story. We come from a small town in Mexico, but I never got to see much of it. In that town, there used to live a gay guy that I never met. He decided to be openly gay. He wore woman's clothes and talked 'funny' and wore make-up and had long hair. He was gay. For me, when I finally understood what it was to not be straight, he was a hero. 
One day he was walking down the street, and I'm not exactly sure why or how it happened, but someone decided it was a good idea, an acceptable idea, to throw gasoline at him, and set him on fire. They burned him alive. He had to run and jump in the town's fountain. He survived, and he kept on being gay, but I will never forget that it was okay for someone to set a person on fire just because they were gay.
He wore the scars for the rest of his life, and for everyone who saw him, it was something that was inevitable. What did he expect it he was gay?

Today, gay people can get married almost anywhere in the world, and they have rights, and if you set someone on fire you will most likely go to jail. Today, it's easy for some people to forget that it was not always like this, but I don't want to forget. For some reason, I don't want to forget. There was a guy in a small town in Mexico who got set on fire because he was gay. It hits you like a slap on the face, doesn't it? When you are old enough to understand that these things happened. This things still happen sometimes, somewhere. That people still get killed because they're trans, because they're gay. That we still cannot come out of the closet because we are afraid. 

Rusty reminded me of this, and I cried more than once thinking about him. I don't think a lot of people would understand why I cry. I told several people, when I was reading the book, "they burned him alive," and nobody, nobody could understand what this meant. They burned him alive just because he was gay. and it makes me cry every time. They burned him alive because he was gay. 

I'm still not sure if I'm disappointed with the truth of the book or not. I honestly can't tell what would be worse or what was more horrifying, but I can tell you that I'm grateful for you to tell the world about this. Whoever read your book needs to know: There was a guy out there, who got burned alive just because he was gay. And whether we like it or not, it's something we don't have the privilege to forget. 


As always, thank you for writing. 
Love and respect.
-Abel. 




"Maybe we don't matter to the universe, Jesse Franklin, but you mattered to me.”
ineffit: (derek)
I got the opportunity today to think, really think, about something that has been bothering me lately. When it comes to realizing about your own mental issues, most of the times it takes a bit to stop blaming said mental issues of everything bad in your life; it's going through this stage of "godammit I have mental issues" to "now everything makes sense that's why I'm so fucked up" and from there is extremely easy to think every single bad thing happening. Don't feel like doing anything? Damn my depression. Don't want to go outside because people? Damn my anxiety. This kind of thing that happens when the brain decides to be lazy and take the easy exit. From there on end is more than just extremely complicated to see that, no, is not the depression what makes things stop being pleasant, it's most likely the fact that now it's too comfortable to blame the depression about it to try and change it.

"I have depression, I can't help it." Mental issues are dangerous like that, and it's hard to keep thinking that mental issues don't define who you are. Mental issues are part of the problem, they are part of you, not you part of them, if that ever makes sense. It's something you have, no something you are.

There are a bunch of things that I enjoy doing, or at least I used to enjoy doing them and now I don't know anymore, because I don't remember how long it has been since I did something I liked, and it was extremely easy to go "I'm depressed, I don't want to do anything." The real question was if is it really that the reason I don't really feel like doing some things that I used to enjoy a lot. Yes, maybe part of the reason is that I feel tired all the time, and sometimes I feel like just not existing anymore, but sometimes it may be also the fact that I don't enjoy doing that as much as I used to anymore. Do I not like it anymore? Yeah, I do like it, probably just as much, but right this moment, when I enjoy other things just as much, that specific thing doesn't look as appealing as the other things I could be doing. Sure, some of those things I do them to escape reality, but to be honest, a lot of the things I do because I like them are to escape reality, that's a thing that I do. 

I figured, then, since this is something that I used to like, and I still like it but I'd rather do something else right now, is fair to think of it as all those fandoms I have "left". The fandoms I still know like the back of my hand, and I still follow in some ways, and still talk to people from those fandoms, but I do not involve myself with participating in them. I don't write for those fandoms anymore, I don't really read anymore --maybe once in a while when I'm feeling nostalgic; they're something I still like, and I still get excited over, but not something constantly in my mind. 

I don't write and read as much as I used to. I don't paint and draw as much as I used to. I don't watch as many tv shows and cartoons as I used to. I don't watch as much anime and read as much manga as I used to. I still love it all with my whole heart, but it's okay to take some distance, maybe I'm trying something new, maybe I need something different; and if I ever have free time and feel like watching something I haven't in a long time, then I know, for sure, that I'm still alive. 

ineffit: (sammydean)
I came across a Teen chat room the other day. Sometimes I still forget I'm not sixteen anymore, I'm not gonna say I went there to see what are the teens up to these days, because I didn't, but that's what I found.
It'd seem 'people our age' don't care anymore what the young are up to these days, like it wasn't just yesterday, or last month, or last year that we were still teens; like it wasn't the other day when we weren't still allow to get drunk (but we did anyway); like we are already allow to not mention our parents anywhere, because we are oh so grown up. But to be honest, we should know that is time we don't forget what we did before we turned thirty. Let's not forget how it was, let's remember how much we hated what adults did to us. Why did we even want to grow up?

I came across a Teen chat room the other day, and between 'ANY GIRLS FOR CAM' and 'YOU WANNA SEE A BIG COCK' lost around, they were talking about politics. The teens we think are too stupid to understand what is going on in the world, were talking about politics, because contrary to popular belief, they know. They know who is going to be twenty when the people you choose for the government are in the power taking stupid decisions.
It is them. And they know they're fucked. They may as well be more fucked than we are now, and whether you want to accept it or not, we are pretty fucked. How much did you have to borrow for school? Who did you have to beg to give you money? How many of you were lucky bastards, and how many were just bastards?  

I guess the point is, when you see teens talking about politics, out of nowhere, in a chat room of all places, you know there's something really wrong with the world. 
ineffit: (stiles)
 Maybe I did or maybe I didn't, but I will never know for sure. 

See, my sister and I we do this thing where we get extremely bored and just go out and buy things to any store we can find; the closest one to home is Walgreens, and the irony of this is that you can find whatever the shit you want there: dog food? Yup; clothes? Sure thing; condoms? Duh; food? Is that even a question? 
So yeah, we go to Walgreens and buy Doritos at 10:00 pm on a Thursday and is nobody's business. 

This time, though, was memorable because of the fact that it was winter, I was extremely bad dressed, we were buying something I don't even remember, and this beautiful girl walks in, wearing a nice coat, kitty knee socks, short skirt, pink high heels, and I froze on the spot.
No way, I tell myself. No fucking way. There are pretty girls dressing like that these days, come on, you and your fucking wishful thinking. Right. So. No way. Then she fucking walks into the kids aisle to grab a teddy bear and a fucking coloring book. And crayons. I'll be damned. 

When I found out about this side of the human nature, one of the most interesting creatures I found weren't exactly the masochists; why not? Well, pain is a pretty common thing, and a lot of people enjoy it even if they don't know, in small quantities maybe, but they do; you can build your pain resistance and there you go. No, one of the most interesting were the pets and the baby girls. Oh, man, the baby girls. 

You see, a lot of people think these creatures are sick, trying to create a pedophile-friendly environment or some shit. They're fucking wrong. These people embrace that state of life we all are forced to leave behind at some point. They don't want to fuck their parent either, they're fucking looking for comfort and safety.
These people are fucking cool. They go back to themselves and explore, and do whatever it is that makes them happy, because you don't necessarily have to leave that part of yourself that made life easy and carefree. And there are other people who find them just incredible and precious and want to take care of them, and it doesn't mean they want to fuck a kid. Alright.

But then again, is kind of really rude to ask someone you don't know if they like to call their partner "Daddy", and play with toys, and make of coloring some sort of foreplay. One does not just ask someone if they're a baby girl, okay, you just don't. Or maybe I would had if my sister hadn't been there, she's open minded but not that much.

I wish I had, though; it would had been pretty cool if she would had said 'yes' and not hit me with her shoe on the face. 
Wishful thinking.  
ineffit: (sammydean)
I finally watched The Great Gatsby. The new one with DiCaprio and Spiderman, not the old one. And there was a reason I hadn't watched it, I knew there was a reason. I mean, I'm not DiCaprio's biggest fan, I like him just fine, like any other person with eyes and ears and access to movies who can see the damn man has talent, and we all cursed all those times they didn't give him his Oscar; you see, I didn't exactly mean not to watch the movie, but it wasn't my priority either, it was just a movie that I thought, well, hey, I should watch that one, what with it being a classic and DiCaprio being there and all that.
So, it was in the back of my mind. Watch the Gatsby. But there was a reason I hadn't.

When we get bored, my sister and I go to the store, or the mall, or the bookstore, or the library, and we buy things that we really don't need but we kind of really want to have just to say we have something.
And so we were at the store looking at the movies, and I wanted to buy Mad Max, because is that kind of thing you just ought to have and I needed to watch it again (and again and again and again in the near future until I get sick and I can't make out faces anymore) and while doing that she saw this movie. The Great Gatsby. And she had watched it before, at school, because she's at high school and they always make you watch this kind of thing when you're there. She liked the damn movie, and she was set I had to watch it. We bought it. Along Mad Max, Spotlight, The Lorax and The Danish girl. And I shouldn't have damn it, I shouldn't have.

You see, we watched The Danish girl, because Trans cinematography and all, and then we waited and waited and didn't watch anything else until just two nights ago. And I hate my life so much, what the fuck.

There was a reason I hadn't watched The Great Gatsby, and it wasn't quite that I'm not a big fan of old movies, or remakes, or remakes of really old movies, or that that Spiderman Guy would never stop being the Spiderman Guy, or that I haven't read the book (which if there was a reason I hadn't even watched the book, where did you think I had read the book); I knew it was going to be one of those damn stories, that somehow change your fucking life forever and you just want to kill someone or cry forever, or kill someone while you cry forever, but at the same time, it leaves you so raw, open and exposed, you just... go to sleep with a sad smile in your face and hope you won't remember in the morning. That kind of story. The kind that makes you feel it was real and really a part of your life.

Or maybe is that I have emotional problems and my brain is fucked up.

Now I have the feeling I need to read the book because maybe there's something missing. Maybe I'm missing something.
And it is that kind of movie that leaves you upset because you can't be fucking upset with any of them. It's quite fucked up.

We have deep conversations at night when we can't sleep or we're thinking too much. You see, I don't like romance. If you ask me if I want to watch something, the last thing in my list is going to be romance, specially if it's sappy romance; I can do sometimes with romcoms, and sad romances, but my mood has to be very special, I have to be really bored or really, really want to watch the movie for a different reason. Romance is not my go to kind of thing, there has to be something special about the romance, something different, really different, or cliché, or just, something. And I'm not gonna say The Great Gatsby is a romance, because it could be, but I'm not gonna say it because it also could not be. But it sure as hell makes you think about love. 

I won't stop thinking for the next hundred years how Tom never loved Daisy like she loved him, and how Daisy never loved Gatsby like she loved Tom. What Daisy felt for Gatsby was a dream, and what Gatsby felt for Daisy was a fantasy, and Nick is the only one that matters. 
And I don't want to talk about love but after all, after everything, I really wonder if it's truly this hard to find someone who can respect you as a person. Because that is my definition of love. Everything else is madness. 
Page generated Jul. 27th, 2025 09:21 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios